IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11036 of 2016 ====================================================== 1. Mohan Singh and Ors s/o- Late Jai Ram Singh 2. Mithilesh Singh S/o- Late Ram Kishun Singh 3. Ravindra Nath Pandey s/o- Late Ram Nandan Pandey 4. Uma Nath Pandey s/o- Late Ram Nandan Pandey 5. Yamuna Pandey s/o- Late Madhav Pandey null 6. Surya Dev Pandey s/o- late Danusdhari Pandey 7. Awadh Bihari Singh s/o- Late Baldev Singh 8. Lalkeshari Devi d/o- late Ragupat Pandey 9. Arun Kumar s/o- Late Bhuneshwar Singh 10. Ram Lakhan Singh s/o- Late Sakal Singh 11. Baleshwar Sharma s/o- Late Debaki Singh 12. Mithilesh Singh s/o- Late Harsh Narayan Singh 13. Sivendra Kumar s/o-Late Janak Dev Singh All Resident of village-Lat, P.S.- Hulasganj Distt.-Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar and Ors 2. The Collector Jehanabad 3. The Dy. Collector Land Reforms Jehanabad 4. The Circle Officer Hulasganj 5. The Mantri Distt. Bhudhan Committee Jehanabad 6. The Bihar Bhudhan Yagna Committee through its Secretary, Gardanibagh Road no-22 Patna-20 ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Resp. 5 & 6 : Mr. Rajni Kant Singh, Adv. For the State : Mr. Prabhakar Thakur, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 21-07-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though State is present. 2. The present writ petition has been preferred: for the issuance of writ in nature of certiorari for quashing of the notice vide memo No.-327 dated 18.04.2016 issued by the Circle officer HulasGanj issued in the name of Patna High Court CWJC No.11036 of 2016(3) dt.21-07-2025 2/2 Mithilesh Singh whereby the land as mentioned in aforesaid notice is going to be measured on 27.04.2016 now extended on 07.05.2016 and so far the other petitioners are concerned only their names are mentioned in notice. Further issuance of any other appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions for which the petitioners are legally entitled. During pendency of this writ petition, the notice dated 18.04.2016 issued by the Anchala Adhikari Hulasganj may kindly be stayed. 3. The counter affidavit is on record duly served upon upon the petitioner in the year 2016 and according to paragraph 10, the complicated dispute between the parties cannot be decided by the Circle Officer and as such, the proceeding was dropped. 4. Neither there is any reply to the said counter affidavit nor the learned counsel has chosen to appear on call. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Vijay Singh/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U