Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70097 (KAR)

M/S. UNIVERSAL TELE SERVICES v. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (TELECOM)

WP/18991/2022 · 2025-12-15

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53120 WP No. 18991 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 18991 OF 2022 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: M/S. UNIVERSAL TELE SERVICES ST. GEORGE BUILDING PULAMON (PO) KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT - 691 506 ALSO AT NO.63, 3RD CROSS, VIVEKANANDA NAGAR, CHIKKATHOGUR, E CITY, BANGALORE - 560 100 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR RAJESH BABU, S/O M.V. BABU AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ROHAN HOSMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (TELECOM) BHARATH SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED, 5TH FLOOR, TELEPHONE HOUSE, RAJ BHAVAN ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (MM/PLG), OFFICE OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (MM), BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED, 5TH FLOOR, TELEPHONE HOUSE, RAJ BHAVAN ROAD, Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53120 WP No. 18991 of 2022 BANGALORE - 560 001. 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL ENGINEER BHARATH SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED, 5TH FLOOR, TELEPHONE HOUSE, RAJ BHAVAN ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. GANGADHARAIAH A.N, ADVOCATE FOR R2; R1 - SERVED UNREPRESENTED) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED REPORT, DATED 08/09/2022, BEARING NO.AGM(MM)/I-27/SAFE CITY EAST/2022-23 OF THE RESPONDENT ENTERPRISE (AT ANNEXURE-F) AND CONSEQUENTLY SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED LETTER ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 , DATED 16/09/2022 (AT ANNEXURE- H) AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner after arguing for sometime submitted that the prayer made in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53120 WP No. 18991 of 2022 Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34