Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:107876 Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8930 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Harsh Ram Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vrat Sheel Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Heard Mr. Vrat Sheel, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shailendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents. This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to direct the respondent no.5 to pay arrears of salary and other dues occurred from the service as retiral benefits as Assistant Teacher in the institution of respondent no.6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made several representations before the respondent authorities for the payment of arrears of salary and other dues occurred from the service as retiral benefits for the period of working as an Assistant Teacher from the year 1992 to 2018, but nothing has been done till date. Hence the present writ petition has been filed. Mr. Shailendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents submits that the petitioner has moved an application claiming for payment of arrears from CT Grade to LT Grade after passage of number of years, therefore, he is not entitled for the same. In support of his submission, he has relied upon a judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Ram Kishor Dixit vs. State of U.P. and 7 Others passed in Writ-A No. 12140 of 2024 decided on 23.08.2024 against which, Special Appeal bearing No.973 of 2024 has been filed, which has been allowed affirming the same. However, he submits that in case a fresh representation is given by the petitioner before the respondent no.5, the same may be decided, in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without going into the merits of the case and with the consent of the parties, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.5- District Basic Education Officer Mau, District-Mau, raising all his grievances within a period of two weeks from today. In case any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.5 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law, by reasoned and speaking order, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order if there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 8.7.2025 Jitendra/- Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad