Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70077 (PNJ)

RAKESH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/32569/2025 · 2025-06-25

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

203 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT RAKESH AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. HARKESH MANUJA 1. By way 2023, prayer has been made for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. dated 14.04.2025 333, 351(3), 324(4), 238(3), 110, 76 and 79 of BNS, 2023 Station Bahuakbarpur, Rohtak wherein, the petition implicated for having given beatings to the complainant and her children. 2. Learned stands concluded with the filing of challan and the petitioners are in custody for the past more t some time. He also submits that the petitioners are not involved in any other case. 3. The prayer made herein has been opposed at the instance of learned State counsel while referring to the injuries suffered complainant on her head. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: RAKESH AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate for the Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) By way of present petition filed under Section prayer has been made for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. dated 14.04.2025 registered under Sections 333, 351(3), 324(4), 238(3), 110, 76 and 79 of BNS, 2023 Bahuakbarpur, Rohtak wherein, the petition implicated for having given beatings to the complainant and her children. Learned counsel for the petitioner stands concluded with the filing of challan and the petitioners are in custody for the past more than 2 months and the trial is likely to take some time. He also submits that the petitioners are not involved in any The prayer made herein has been opposed at the instance of learned State counsel while referring to the injuries suffered complainant on her head. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-32569-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: June 25, 2025 ........Petitioners ........Respondent HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. of present petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, prayer has been made for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 59 registered under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 190. 191(1), 333, 351(3), 324(4), 238(3), 110, 76 and 79 of BNS, 2023 at Police Bahuakbarpur, Rohtak wherein, the petitioners have been implicated for having given beatings to the complainant and her children. counsel for the petitioners submits that investigation stands concluded with the filing of challan and the petitioners are in han 2 months and the trial is likely to take some time. He also submits that the petitioners are not involved in any The prayer made herein has been opposed at the instance of learned State counsel while referring to the injuries suffered by the 483 of BNSS, 59 115(2), 117(2), 190. 191(1), at Police been implicated for having given beatings to the complainant and her children. that investigation stands concluded with the filing of challan and the petitioners are in han 2 months and the trial is likely to take some time. He also submits that the petitioners are not involved in any The prayer made herein has been opposed at the instance of by the TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.06.25 12:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-32569-2025 (O&M) -2- 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the paper book. I find substance in the submissions made on behalf of the petitioners. 5. In the present case, investigation stands concluded with the filing of challan. The petitioners are in custody for the past more than 2 months and the alleged occurrence as per the version given in the FIR took place between the neighbours. Moreover, the petitioners are stated to be not involved in any other case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this Court does not find justification to extend their incarceration any further. 6. In view of the above, without commenting anything on the merits, lest it may prejudice the case of either side, the present petition is allowed and the petitioners are ordered to be released on regular bail on their furnishing adequate bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned learned trial Court/Duty Magistrate. 7. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 25.06.2025 (HARKESH MANUJA) Tejwinder JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.06.25 12:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document