IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 123 CR No.4516 of 2023 (O&M) Date of Order:30.04.2025 Satinder Pal Singh .Petitioner Versus Chandigarh Press Club and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present: Ms. Ruchi Sekhri, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Pardeep Virk, Advocate, for the respondents ANIL KSHETARPAL, JUDGE (Oral) 1. The learned counsel representing the petitioner, after arguing for some time, prays for permission to withdraw the revision petition in order to contest her suit which is pending before the Court. She submits that the trial court should be directed to decide the suit uninfluenced by the impugned orders passed by the courts below. 2. The courts have only dismissed the application filed for grant of temporary mandatory injunction. Such observations made by the court are not binding when the suit is decided. 3. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the observations that the trial court will proceed to decide the suit uninfluenced by the observations made in the impugned orders, 4. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. (ANIL KSHETARPAL) JUDGE April 30, 2025 nt Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2025.04.30 14:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document