TULSI DASH ALIAS TULSI DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./2068/2025 · 2025-06-23
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7006 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7006 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:16582] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.2068 of 2025
------ Tulsi Dash @ Tuli Das aged about 33 years, Son of Kistu Dash @ Kistu Das, resident of village: Bara, Near Kali Mandir, P.O. Sahara, P.S. Taljhari, District Dumka, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-23-06-2025 I.A. No.7130 of 2025
Heard the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this interlocutory application has been filed for early hearing.
Since the hearing of this bail application is taken up today, hence, this interlocutory application is disposed of being infructuous.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) B.A. No.2068 of 2025
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Kersai P.S. Case No.20 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 319(2)/318(4)/61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66D of I.T. Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cyber crime. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that only because one mobile phone, one ATM, one credit card and one passport were recovered from the possession of the petitioner, hence, he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 24.10.2024 as is evident from para-13 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner
undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Simdega in connection with Kersai P.S. Case No.20 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/