HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 19984 of 2024 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Although, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 is present but none appeared on behalf of petitioners even in the revised call. 2. By way of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital life of petitioners, has been sought. 3. At the very outset, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel sought the attention of the court over the documents appended for substantiating the prayer as made in the petition but at the same time, it is also intimated by learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel that the instant petition has been preferred in the year 2024 and at present, no cause of action is surviving and as such, the prayer made in the petition has become redundant. 4. Considering the arguments raised by learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, it is crystal clear that the instant matter has been preferred at the behest of petitioners for prayer mentioned herein but the same was perpetuating against the adverse situation available before petitioners in the year and time when the instant petition has been filed. 5. At present, no cause of action survives for pressing the instant petition preferred at the behest of the petitioners and as such, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 24, 2025 Rakesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Diwan Saifullah Khan, Shama Parveen Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Vaibhavi And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad