Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70050 (ALL)

HARISHCHANDRA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/8684/2025 · 2025-07-02

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:104354 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8684 of 2025 Petitioner :- Harishchandra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudarshan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties By means of present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution petitioner has challenged the transfer order dated 14.6.2025 passed by respondent no. 3 on the ground that he has only two years for his retirment and hence as per transfer policy he should not have been transferred. Learned Standing counsel has no objection in case if petitioner's representation is directed to be decided by the concerned competent respondent in a time bound period and in accordance with law provided petitioner makes a fresh representation as petitioner has already stood relieved. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with direction to the petitioner to move fresh representation raising all his grievance before respondent no. 3 within a period of two weeks from today and in the event any representation is moved, respondent no. 3 will look into and consider the same and dispose of the same within a further period of four weeks' in accordance with law. Order Date :- 3.7.2025 Sanjeev Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad