` ARB-333-2024 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 260 ARB-333-2024 Date of Decision: 15.07.2025 M/s Om Ma Gaytri Enterprises …Petitioner Versus M/s Prisha JMD Pvt. Ltd. and another …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - None for the applicant *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. Through instant application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short ‘1996 Act’), the applicant is seeking appointment of an Arbitrator. 2. There was no representation on behalf of the applicant on 13.01.2025 and in the interest of justice, the matter was adjourned for 26.03.2025. On the said date, learned counsel for the applicant again sought permission to serve the respondent through dasti process. The applicant, at the first instance, was permitted to serve the respondent by dasti process vide order dated 25.07.2024. 3. As per office report, nobody turned up to collect dasti notice and even today, there is no representation on behalf of the applicant. It appears that the applicant has lost its interest to pursue the present application. MOHIT KUMAR 2025.07.15 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. ` ARB-333-2024 -2- 4. Dismissed for non-prosecution. 5. Since, there is no representation on behalf of the applicant, it is at liberty to move an appropriate application within three months, if cause survives. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 15.07.2025 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2025.07.15 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.