218 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-358-2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 28, 2025 Phuman Singh … Appellant Versus Surjan Singh and another …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- None for the appellant. Mr. Lavish Arora, Advocate for respondent No.1. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) On the last date of hearing, following order was passed:- “There is no representaon on behalf of the appellant. In the interest of jusce, adjourned to 28.01.2025. Inmaon to the counsel for the appellant be sent for the date fixed, making it clear that no further opportunity shall be provided. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected case.” Today again there is no representa$on on behalf of the appellant. In compliance of the aforesaid order, in$ma$on to Shri K.S. Brar and Sh. G.S. Punia, Advocates for the appellant was sent, as reported by the Registry. S$ll, nobody has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant. In the circumstances, it is apparent that the appellant is no longer interested in pursuing this appeal. Dismissed in default for want of prosecu$on. January 28, 2025 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Sarita Rani 2025.01.29 10:13 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order