Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7003 (UTT)

SRI NIKHIL KUMAR v. ARTI SAKLANI

WPMS/1432/2019 · 2025-01-06

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:126 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS No. 1432 of 2019 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. 1. Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Ms. Arushi Batra, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel for the respondent. 3. Petitioner is plaintiff in Original Suit No. 52 of 2011. He filed a temporary injunction application, which was rejected by the trial court. Petitioner challenged trial court’s order by filing miscellaneous appeal, which too was dismissed by learned Appellate Court. Thus, feeling aggrieved, petitioner filed this writ petition in 2019. 4. As per report, received from Civil Judge (J.D.), Rishikesh, District Dehradun, Original Suit No. 52 of 2011, Nikhil Kumar Vs. Smt. Aarti Saklani was disposed of by the trial court on 05.08.2022. 5. Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the said suit has been decided. 6. In such view of the matter, the relief claimed in the writ petition do not survive. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 06.01.2025 Aswal NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a08b 08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DACF4 F4610C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2025.01.06 17:40:32 +05'30' 2025:UHC:126