Pathan Riyaz Khan Shaukat Khan v. BALASAHEB BHAUSAHEB JADHAV AND OTHERS
CP/887/2024 · 2025-11-10
Shri N B Suryawanshi, Vaishali Patil Jadhav
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70019 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70019 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
{1} cp887-24.doc drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.887 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6394 OF 2019 Pathan Riyaz Khan Shaukat Khan
PETITIONER VERSUS Balasaheb Bhausaheb Jadhav and Others RESPONDENTS ....... Ms. Nishat Sk h/f Mr. Sayyed Tauseef Yaseen Advocate for Petitioner Mr. A. V. Lavte, AGP for Respondent - State ....… [CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. J.] DATE : 10
th NOVEMBER, 2025
ORDER :
1. Pursuant to the directions of this Court dated 9th October, 2025, Respondent No.3 is present in the Court. She has produced copy of the order dated 3rd November, 2025 by which the Petitioner is appointed on the post of Peon, in the pay scale of Rs.15,000 – 47600/-, on probation for 6 months’ period, on certain terms and conditions. She, therefore, contends that the
order of this Court is complied with. Copy of the order dated 3rd November, 2025 is marked “X” for identification.
2. Learned Advocate for Respondent No.3 submits that this
{2} cp887-24.doc
order is already served on the Petitioner on 3rd November, 2025 itself and points out the endorsement of the Petitioner on the said order.
3. In view of issuance of the appointment order, directions of this Court are complied with. Hence, the Contempt Petition is
disposed of.
[ VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE JUDGE
drp/cp887-24.doc