Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70009 (ALL)

HARENDRA VERMA v. State of UP AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/9185/2024 · 2025-05-22

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:87968 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9185 of 2024 Petitioner :- Harendra Verma Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhilesh Kumar,Kuldeep Kumar,Prem Prakash Yadav,Ranjana Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner to include the period he has spent as work charge employee in the establishment so as to compute the amount of pension and gratuity. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in above regard petitioner has already made a representation before the authority concerned which has remained unconsidered till date. Learned Standing Counsel states that petitioner may approach the competent authority with a fresh representation for consideration of his claim that may be directed to be decided in accordance with law. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make fresh representation before the concerned respondent within a period of four weeks from today and in the event such representation is made as directed herein above, the same shall be considered and decided strictly in accordance with law within a further period of two months. Order Date :- 23.5.2025 Atmesh Digitally signed by :- ATMESH KESARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad