Sailesh Shrestha v. District Magistrate, Gangtok and Ors.
WP(C)/60/2025 · 2026-03-31
Meenakshi Madan Rai
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7 (SIK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7 (SIK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No.2 HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings
WP(C) No.60 of 2025 SAILESH SHRESTHA
PETITIONER
VERSUS
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GANGTOK AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS
Date: 31.03.2026
CORAM :
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE
For Petitioner
For Respondents R-1
R-2 & 3
R-4
Mr. Binod Kumar Chakraborty, Advocate. Mr. Lahang Limboo, Advocate.
Mr. Zangpo Sherpa, Additional Advocate General. Ms. Pema Bhutia, Assistant Government Advocate.
Mr. Debanjan Chakraborty, Advocate. Mr. Zigmee Dorjee Bhutia, Advocate.
Mr. Sudesh Joshi, Senior Advocate. Mr. Adarsh Gurung, Advocate.
ORDER
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that they seek to withdraw the instant matter.
Learned Counsel for the Respondents No.2 and 3 submits that since the time of the Counsel and this Court has been wasted, heavy costs be imposed on the Petitioner. Having heard Learned Counsel for the parties, I am not inclined to impose costs on the Petitioner.
The prayer of the Petitioner is allowed and the Writ Petition
disposed of as withdrawn.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
Judge 31.03.2026
bb/sdl
2026:SHC:20