Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Sikkim · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7 (SIK)

Sailesh Shrestha v. District Magistrate, Gangtok and Ors.

WP(C)/60/2025 · 2026-03-31

Meenakshi Madan Rai

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No.2 HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings WP(C) No.60 of 2025 SAILESH SHRESTHA PETITIONER VERSUS DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GANGTOK AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS Date: 31.03.2026 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE For Petitioner For Respondents R-1 R-2 & 3 R-4 Mr. Binod Kumar Chakraborty, Advocate. Mr. Lahang Limboo, Advocate. Mr. Zangpo Sherpa, Additional Advocate General. Ms. Pema Bhutia, Assistant Government Advocate. Mr. Debanjan Chakraborty, Advocate. Mr. Zigmee Dorjee Bhutia, Advocate. Mr. Sudesh Joshi, Senior Advocate. Mr. Adarsh Gurung, Advocate. ORDER Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that they seek to withdraw the instant matter. Learned Counsel for the Respondents No.2 and 3 submits that since the time of the Counsel and this Court has been wasted, heavy costs be imposed on the Petitioner. Having heard Learned Counsel for the parties, I am not inclined to impose costs on the Petitioner. The prayer of the Petitioner is allowed and the Writ Petition disposed of as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. Judge 31.03.2026 bb/sdl 2026:SHC:20