VINAYAK PRASAD SHUKLA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/32485/2025 · 2025-08-07
Subhas Mehla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69972 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69972 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[210]
Vinayak Prasad Shukla and another
State of Haryana and another
Coram :
Present:
SUBHAS MEHLA
[1]
in Court today. The same is taken on record. [2]
petitioners have joined the investigation in this matter as per the direction of this Court. been settled with the complainant and the compromise and the petitioners are senior citizens and having clear and clean antecedents and are not involv [3]
contention made by counsel for the petitioners, submitting that the value of the property is in crores and the compromise effected between the parties is under threat of the Police after one year petition.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M- Date of Decision :
Vinayak Prasad Shukla and another
versus State of Haryana and another
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA
Mr. Aditya Prakash Arora, Advocate Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Karan Veer Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana for respondent No.1. Mr. A.K. Ranolia, Advocate *** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (ORAL)
Reply on behalf of respondent No.2 in Court today. The same is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that both the petitioners have joined the investigation in this matter as per the direction of this Court. Learned counsel further submitted that been settled with the complainant and they have the compromise and the order has also been passed by petitioners are senior citizens and having clear and clean antecedents and are not involved in any criminal activities.
Learned counsel for respondents No.2 contention made by counsel for the petitioners, submitting that the value of the property is in crores and the compromise effected between the parties is r threat of the Police, even the FIR in present matter one year of complaint made to police and prayed for dismissal of
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -32485-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 07.08.2025
…Petitioners versus
….Respondents SUBHAS MEHLA Advocate and Mr. Pranjal P. for the petitioners. Mr. Karan Veer Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana for respondent No.1. for respondent No.2. Reply on behalf of respondent No.2-complainant has been filed in Court today. The same is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that both the petitioners have joined the investigation in this matter as per the direction of further submitted that the civil dispute has also they have made the payment as per has also been passed by the Court. The petitioners are senior citizens and having clear and clean antecedents and are
Learned counsel for respondents No.2-complainant opposed the contention made by counsel for the petitioners, submitting that the value of the property is in crores and the compromise effected between the parties is in present matter has been registered of complaint made to police and prayed for dismissal of
Mr. Karan Veer Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana for respondent No.1. been filed
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that both the petitioners have joined the investigation in this matter as per the direction of the civil dispute has also made the payment as per Court. The petitioners are senior citizens and having clear and clean antecedents and are complainant opposed the contention made by counsel for the petitioners, submitting that the value of the property is in crores and the compromise effected between the parties is has been registered of complaint made to police and prayed for dismissal of RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.08.11 19:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-32485-2025 (O&M)
-2-
[4]
Learned State Counsel, on instructions from ASI Ram Singh, submitted that the petitioners have joined the investigation and they are no longer required for further investigation. [5]
In view of the aforesaid, order dated 16.06.2025, whereby the petitioners were granted interim bail, is hereby made absolute. However, they shall continue to join investigation, if so required by the Investigating Officer. [6]
Disposed of. [7]
All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands
disposed of.
(SUBHAS MEHLA)
JUDGE
07.08.2025 ‘R. Sharma'
Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable
: Yes/No
RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.08.11 19:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document