Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69967 (KAR)

SRI PYARU SAB v. THE KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF AUQAF

CRP/160/2019 · 2025-10-30

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43752 CRP No. 160 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.160 OF 2019 BETWEEN: SRI. PYARU SAB, S/O LATE SHAIK AHMED SAB, AGED MAJOR, MUJAWAR, DARGAH HAZRATH SYED JALAL, KHAKI SHAH VALI, NIMKAYALAHALLI VILLAGE, NANDIGANAHALLI POST, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA-563 125. …PETITIONER (BY MS. SHRAVANI P.T., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAHUL S. REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF AUQAF, NO.6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BENGALURU-560 052. REP BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 2. THE MANAGING COMMITTEE, DARGAH HAZRATH SYED JALAL KHAKI SHAH VALI, NIMKAYALAHALLI VILLAGE, NANDIGANAHALLI POST, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA-563 125. Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43752 CRP No. 160 of 2019 3. SRI. MOULA ALI, S/O LATE ABDUL RAZAK SAB, MUJAWAR (UNDER CHALLENGE) DARGAH HAZRATH SYED JALAL KHAKI SHAH VALI, NIMKAYALAHALLI VILLAGE, NANDIGANAHALLI POST, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA-563 125. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.D. BASAVARAJA, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. MOHAMMED TIPPU SULTHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R2; R3 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.83[9] OF WAKF ACT., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 30.01.2019 PASSED ON IA NO.1 IN APPLICATION NO.12/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER, KARNATAKA WAKF TRIBUNAL BENGALURU DN: BENGALURU DISMISSING THE IA NO.1 FILED UNDER SEC.5 OF THE LIMITATION ACT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the revision petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal. The memo reads as under: "The counsel for the petitioner herein most humbly submits that the Petition has become Infructuous and hence withdrawing this Civil revision petition. Hence filing this memo for the kind perusal of this Hon'ble court in the interest of justice and equity.” - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43752 CRP No. 160 of 2019 Placing the memo on record, the revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE DS CT:TSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 49