Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69964 (ALL)

VINOD KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/22932/2025 · 2025-07-09

Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:109810 Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22932 of 2025 Applicant :- Vinod Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Bipin Kumar,Mohd. Naushad Siddiqui Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J. 1. Heard Sri Mohd. Naushad Siddiqui, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rajeev Kr. Singh, learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been filed to enlarge the applicant on bail in case crime No. 43 of 2025, under Sections 303(2), 317(2) BNS, P.S. Rendhar, District Jalaun. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that as per the allegation in the FIR, the trolley of the first informant was stolen on 26.3.2025 and subsequently, when he tried to search out the said trolley, the same was found in the house of the applicant. However, the police have shown the recovery of the trolley on 24.5.2025 from a road and not from the house of the applicant. The aforesaid recovery was not witnessed by the public witness. It has been further submitted that all the offence are punishable upto 7 years. The applicant is a law abiding citizen and he is languishing in jail since 24.5.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail. 5. Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case as well as law laid down by the Apex Court regarding offences punishable upto 7 years in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another; (2021) 10 SCC 773 and Siddharth vs State of U.P. and another; (2022) 1 SCC 676 and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. Let the applicant- Vinod Kumar, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Order Date :- 10.7.2025 Vandana Digitally signed by :- VANDANA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad