901 CONT. PETITION NO. 719 OF 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 901 CONT. PETITION NO. 719 OF 2017 IN CA/1550/2016 A. B. Lodha, a Propriatory Firm Through Its Proprietor Anil Bansilal Lodha Through GPA Rajendra S. Dhoka VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others … • Mr. Kulkarni Sunil A., Advocate for the Petitioner • Mr. A. R. Kale, AGP for State … CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI & VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 09.12.2025 P E R C O U R T : 1. Affidavit-in-reply on behalf of Respondent No. 1 is filed, stating that there were several deficiencies in the application filed by the petitioner for renewal of his quarry license. 2. In spite of repeated communications, the petitioner did not take steps to remove the deficiencies and he preferred the present contempt petition. 3. Respondent No. 1 has decided petitioner’s application and the decision is communicated to the petitioner on 05.12.2025. Copy of the said order is also annexed along with the reply. The order is, therefore, complied with. 4. Learned advocate for the petitioner states that petitioner has stopped his activity of mining / quarry. 5. In view of the above, nothing survives in the contempt petition and the same is, therefore, disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, J.] [NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] komal kamble 1/1 2025:BHC-AUG:35305-DB