KANCHAN SEHGAL AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CWP/17322/2025 · 2025-07-02
Alok Jain, Sudhir Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69950 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69950 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-17322-2025 (O&M)
152 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Kanchan Sehgal and another State of Punjab
CORAM: HON
HON
Present:- Mr.
Ms. Arundhati Kulshrestha, AAG Punjab
Mr. Avin Sandhu, Advocate
for respondents No.2 and 3/GMADA.
SUDHIR SINGH
Present Writ in the nature of Rs.10,00,000/- of the allotment letter dated 29.01.2019 (Annexure P preferred/ prime location
2.
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that case of the petitioner titled as Daulat Ram Bhatti versus State of Punjab cases by a Co 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH Date of decision: Kanchan Sehgal and another versus Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Mr. Chandan Singh Advocate for Ms. Arundhati Kulshrestha, AAG Punjab Mr. Avin Sandhu, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3/GMADA. ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present Writ Petition herein, inter alia in the nature of Certiorari for setting aside the impugned demand of - raised vide condition No.3 of the Annexure attached at the end the allotment letter dated 29.01.2019 (Annexure P preferred/ prime location. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that case of the petitioner is covered with the decision Daulat Ram Bhatti versus State of Punjab by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17322-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: July 02, 2025 ….Petitioners ….Respondents SUDHIR SINGH ALOK JAIN Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Arundhati Kulshrestha, AAG Punjab. for respondents No.2 and 3/GMADA. inter alia, is for issuance of a Writ setting aside the impugned demand of raised vide condition No.3 of the Annexure attached at the end the allotment letter dated 29.01.2019 (Annexure P-5) on account of At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that case is covered with the decision rendered in CWP-9719-2019 Daulat Ram Bhatti versus State of Punjab and other connected ordinate Bench of this Court vide judgment/order dated
2
2025 (O&M) , 2025 s s Writ setting aside the impugned demand of raised vide condition No.3 of the Annexure attached at the end 5) on account of At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that case 2019 and other connected
order dated MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.07.04 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment
CWP-17322-2025 (O&M)
2 of 2
20.02.2025 (Annexure P-12). He submits that the present writ petition may be
disposed of in terms thereof.
3.
On the other hand, on advance service of copy of petition, learned State counsel and learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3/ GMADA appear and raise no objection to the same.
4.
In view of the above and without commenting on the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of, and the respondent-authorities are
directed to examine the case of the petitioner in light of the decision in Daulat Ram Bhatti’s case (supra) as referred above, and pass an appropriate
order, in accordance with law, as per the State litigation policy.
5.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(SUDHIR SINGH)
JUDGE
(ALOK JAIN)
JUDGE July 02, 2025 mahavir
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable:
Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.07.04 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment