2025:UHC:5886 Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1/888/2025 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Ms. Prabha Naithani, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Pankaj Joshi, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. Present applicant Udayraj Besla Gujar, S/o Sanjeev Kumar is praying for regular bail in relation to FIR dated 29.03.2025, bearing FIR/Case Crime No. 0135 of 2025 registered at P.S. Kotwali Jwalapur District Haridwar which was lodged against the unknown persons for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 115(2), 118(1), 190, 191(2), 191(3) of BNS 2023. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated, and, furthermore, charge sheet has already been filed, and as such, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant. Apart from this, it is argued that other three co-accused have already enlarged on bail. She further submits that the applicant, though, not claiming parity but the role as assigned is identical to those other co-accused who have been granted bail. She further submits that there is one criminal case against the applicant that to in the State of Uttar Pradesh in which he is already bailed out. 5. On the other side, learned State Counsel has not disputed this fact that charge sheet has already been filed and there is no need of custodial 2025:UHC:5886 interrogation of the applicant and also not disputed that other three co-accused have already been granted bail by this Court. 6. After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration that other three co-accused have already been enlarged on bail and the charge sheet is also filed this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail. 7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant “Udayraj Besla Gujar” be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 9. It is made clear that grant of bail to the present applicant will not be treated as precedent to the other co-accused. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 08.07.2025 Parul 2025:UHC:5886