2025:KER:30404 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.B. SNEHALATHA TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 18TH CHAITHRA, 1947 MAT.APPEAL NO. 262 OF 2020 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 19.05.2018 IN OP NO.1166 OF 2014 OF FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKKARA APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS IN THE OP: 1 DR.FATHIMA RAHIM, AGED 32 YEARS, NOW AGED 31 YEARS, WIFE OF ZULFIKKER RAHUMANIYA, THAMARAKKULAM, MAVELIKARA ALAPUZHA DISTRICT, 690 530. 2 MUHAMMED ALDHIN (MINOR), AGED 8 YEARS REPRESENTED BY THE 1ST APPELLANT RAHUMANIYA, THAMARAKKULAM, MAVELIKARA ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT 690 530. BY ADVS. SRI.P.G.SURESH SMT.ASWATHY KRISHNAN RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT IN THE OP: ZULFIKKER, AGED 43 YEARS, SON OF SALIM RAWTHER THACHANTAYYATH THEKKATHIL, THAMARAKULAM P.O. MAVELIKARA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT 690 530. BY ADVS. SMT.NAINA RAJI NAIR SRI.M.J.JOHNSON SRI.K.A.ANI JOSEPH THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 2025:KER:30404 Mat Appeal 262/20 2 JUDGMENT Devan Ramachandran, J. When this matter was called today, the learned counsel for the appellants submitted that, in view of the ‘Mubarath Settlement Agreement’, which has been produced on record as Annexure A1, along with I.A.No.1/2025, this Appeal is not being pressed. 2. The learned counsel for the respondent submitted that his client adheres to the afore ‘Mubarath Settlement Agreement’ and confirmed that the parties are governed by the same. In the afore circumstances, we accede to the request of the learned counsel for the appellants and dismiss this Appeal as being not pressed. Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE Sd/- M.B. SNEHALATHA JUDGE RR