BIKASH SHARMA @ BITTU @ BIKASH kumar @ BITTU sharma and ORS. v. State Of Bihar and Anr
CR. MISC./21907/2016 · 2025-09-15
Purnendu Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69923 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69923 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21907 of 2016 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1398 Year-2009 Thana- KHAGARIA COMPALINT CASE District- Khagaria ======================================================
1.
BIKASH SHARMA @ BITTU @ BIKASH kumar @ BITTU sharma and ORS. son of Ashok Sharma.
2. Ashok Sharma, son of Late Pramod Mistry.
3. Usha Devi W/o Ashok Sharma.
4. Nikki Kumari, D/o of Ashok Sharma.
5. Manohar Sharma, Son of Late Pramod Mistry. All are residents of Mohalla- Bari Kali Asthan, Hazipur, War No, 10 Andar Nagar Parishad Khagaria, P... Khagaria, District- Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. State Of Bihar
2. Priti Sharma, Wife of Rajesh Vishwakarma Daughter of Tejnarain Mistri Resident of Mohalla- Post Office Road, Ward No 19 Andar Nagar, Parishad, Khagaria, P.S.- Khagaria, District- Khagaria. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 15-09-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.
2. The present application has been filed for quashing of the order dated 25.01.2016 passed in Criminal Revision No.89 of 2015 by learned Sessions Judge, Khagaria affirming the order dated 10.06.2015 passed in Complaint Case No.1398C of 2009 by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria, who had rejected the discharge petition filed by the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21907 of 2016(3) dt.15-09-2025 2/2 petitioner.
3. It has been informed by the learned District Court vide letter dated 05.06.2025 that the case is at the stage of hearing in connection with Criminal Revision No.89 of 2015.
4. In view of the changed stage of trial, the present quashing application stands consigned with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy.
Ashishsingh/- (Purnendu Singh, J) U T