Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69918 (PNJ)

MAHENDER AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/32564/2025 · 2025-08-27

Yashvir Singh Rathor

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-32564-2025 - 1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 282 CRM-M-32564-2025 Date of decision: 27.08.2025 MAHENDER AND OTHERS ....Petitioners Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present : Mr. Omkar Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Vasundhara Anand, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Ms. Jasleen Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2. YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR. J.(Oral) 1. Prayer in this petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for quashing of F.I.R. No.107 dated 10.04.2019, registered under Sections 323, 353, 186, 341 and 506 of IPC at Police Station Ladwa, District Kurukshetra and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise. 2. This Court vide order dated 01.07.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send his/her report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties had appeared before learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kurukshetra and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has submitted report dated 15.07.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties AMANDEEP GOSAIN 2025.08.27 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment CRM-M-32564-2025 - 2- voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 6. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant F.I.R. following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 titled as “Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another” and approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in (2012) 10 SCC 303 titled as “Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others”, this petition is allowed and the present FIR along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom qua petitioner(s), are hereby quashed. (YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR) 27.08.2025 JUDGE amandeep Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No AMANDEEP GOSAIN 2025.08.27 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment