213 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-23627-2018 Date of Decision: 09.07.2025 Vinay Kumar Kakkar …Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and Others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Suresh Nain, Advocate for Mr. Manjeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Padamkant Dwivedi, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. Mr. Abhishek K. Premi, Advocate for respondent No.4. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the parties submits that respondent No.4 has already retired whose promotion is under challenge. The petitioner has also retired. 2. The petitioner as well as respondent No.4 have retired, thus, the petition has rendered infructuous. 3. Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 09.07.2025 Prince Chawla Whether Speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.07.09 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document