Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69913 (ALL)

NITIN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/23623/2025 · 2025-07-08

Samit Gopal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 64 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23623 of 2025 Applicant :- Nitin Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Mukul Yadav,Rajesh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sanjay Ojha Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J. 1. List revised. 2. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this bail application despite the fact that there are two learned counsels appearing in the matter. 3. Sri Sanjay Ojha, learned counsel for the first informant and Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for the State are present. 4. Office to trace out the vakalatnama of Sri Sanjay Ojha and place it on record and make a note in the order sheet about it. 5. This bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the applicant Nitin, seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No. 98 of 2025, under Sections 331(6), 351(2), 115(2), 70(2) BNS, 2023 and Section 5G/6 of POCSO Act, registered at P.S. Chhajlet, District Moradabad. 6. Despite the matter being taken up in the revised list, there is no representation from the side of the applicant to press this bail application. It appears that learned counsel for the applicant has lost interest in the matter. 7. In view of the above, the present bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution. Order Date :- 9.7.2025 M. ARIF (Samit Gopal, J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad