SYED TASADUQ HUSSAIN QADRI v. HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR HCOURT
WP(C)/856/2021 · 2025-05-14
Sanjay Parihar, Sanjeev Kumar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6990 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6990 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 5 Regular List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 856/2021 SYED TASADUQ HUSSAIN QADRI
...PETITIONER(S) Through: - Mr. Salih Pirzada, Advocate with
Mr. Bhat Shafi, Advocate
Vs.
HIGH COURT OF J&K HIGH COURT. …RESPONDENT(S)
Through:- Mr. Aatir Kawoosa, Advocate
Mr. Faheem Nisar Shah, GA
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 14.05.2025
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that due to subsequent development, this petition has been rendered infructuous and, therefore, he has instructions from the petitioner not to press this petition. Statement of learned counsel for the petitioner is taken on record. Dismissed as not pressed. Interim direction, if any, subsisting shall stand vacated.
(SANJAY PARIHAR)
(SANJEEV KUMAR)
JUDGE
JUDGE Srinagar, 14.05.2025
“Mir Arif” Arif Hameed I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 16.05.2025