SUNITA DEVI AND ANTOHER v. STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
CRWP/6498/2025 · 2025-09-02
Vinod S Bhardwaj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69895 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69895 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 229
CRWP-6498-2025
Date of decision: 02.09.2025
SUNITA DEVI AND ANTOHER
......Petitioners
VERSUS
STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS .......Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
*****
Present: - Mr. Karan Kapoor, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Arav Gupta, Addl. Public Prosecutor
for respondents No.1 to 3-U.T. Chandigarh.
***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)
The present petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of the private respondents No. 4 to 6.
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contends that the private respondents have left the locality and as such, the apprehensions of danger with respect to their life and liberty is sufficiently diluted. He thus does not press the instant petition at this stage with liberty to file a fresh petition on a similar cause as and when any such cause of action accrues.
VISHAL SHARMA 2025.09.03 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-6498-2025
-2-
Disposed of as not pressed at this stage with liberty as aforesaid.
(VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) SEPTEMBER 02, 2025
JUDGE Vishal Sharma
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable
: Yes/No VISHAL SHARMA 2025.09.03 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document