Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 28612 of 2025 Charan Naik ..... Petitioner Mr. N. Lenka, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. S., ASC CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 13.10.2025 Order No. 01 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court would graciously be pleased to admit the writ petition, issue Rule NISI in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other writ/writs as deem fit and proper calling upon the Opp. Parties to show cause as to why the Opp. Parties No. 3 shall not be directed to publish the result of recruitment under taken pursuant to the advertisement vide Annexure- 3 and why he shall not be directed to issue the order of appointment in favour of the petitioner as attendant after taking approval of the Opp. Party No.2 in strict compliance of the SOP issued for the said purpose. And if the Opp. Parties fail to show cause or show insufficient cause the said Rule be made absolute; And/or pass any other writ/writs, order/orders the Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts & circumstances of the case Page 2 of 2. And for which act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.” 4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No. 3 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of two (2) weeks hence. 5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 3 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 3 be communicated to the Petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Sneha