VIJAYKUMAR S/O BABURAO MHETRE v. SUNANDA W/O VIJAYKUMAR MHETRE
WP/678/2020 · 2025-12-04
Shri Sushil M Ghodeswar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69890 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69890 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
*1* 938crwp678o20 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 678 OF 2020 VIJAYKUMAR S/O BABURAO MHETRE VERSUS SUNANDA W/O VIJAYKUMAR MHETRE ... Shri A.R. Tapse h/f Shri Nagarsoge Sahebrao A., Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri M. K. Kolpe, Advocate for the Respondent. ...
CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.
DATE : 04 December 2025 P. C. :-
1. Learned advocates for the parties state that in the passage of time, the proceedings from which the impugned order arises and which are pending before the Trial Court, have been
disposed of and, therefore, the instant petition has become infructuous.
2. In view of the above statement, the Writ Petition is
disposed of as infructuous. kps ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. ) 2025:BHC-AUG:33598