Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69883 (KAR)

RAVI KUMAR K v. BANK OF BARODA

WP/1311/2023 · 2025-12-02

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50117 WP No. 1311 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.1311 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. RAVI KUMAR K. S/O A. KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R.AT NO.1603 DEVARACHIKKANAHALLI, BEGUR ROAD, OPP. TO SRI RAMA TEMPLE, IIM POST, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560076. 2. YELLAMMA W/O A. KRISHNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT NO.1603 DEVARACHIKKANAHALLI BEGUR ROAD, OPP. TO SRI RAMA TEMPLE, IIM POST, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 076. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SANJAY KUMAR B.V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANK OF BARODA (EARLIER VIJAYA BANK) REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1979 Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50117 WP No. 1311 of 2023 HAVING ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT KORAMANGALA BRANCH NO.44 SAIR KRUPA 17TH MAIN ROAD, VI BLOCK, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU - 560 095 REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER VJKORA@bankofbaroda.co.in …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SHETTY VIGNESH SHIVARAM, ADVOCATE) ************** THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS DATED 01.10.2021, PASSED BY THE HON'BLE XLI ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, AT BENGALURU, ON THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT HEREIN UNDER SECTION 14 OF SARFASI ACT IN CRL. MIS.NO.192/2021 VIDE ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50117 WP No. 1311 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that the account of the petitioner has been regularised and in that view of the matter, the prayer made in this writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31