- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37048 RP No. 220 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REVIEW PETITION NO.220 OF 2023 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. DEEKSHIT C. AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, S/O SRI CHANDRAPPA, R/AT NO.10, ESHWAR NILAYA, INDIRA STREET, 80 FEET ROAD, 7TH MAIN, 1ST CROSS, SUBBANAPALYA, BANASWADI MAIN ROAD, M.S NAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 033. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. V. ANAND, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. AISHWARYA T.L. ALSO KNOWN LAKSHMI, D/O SRI. LOKESH T.L. AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, 2. BABY BOY DISHAN POONARV S/O C DEEKSHIT, AGED ABOUT 4 YEARS, MINOR REPRESENTED BY GUARDIAN RESPONDENT NO. 1. R/AT GOKULA LAYOUT, PARIJATHA ROAD, Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37048 RP No. 220 of 2023 6TH CROSS, NEAR FIRE STATION, TUMAKURU-572104. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PAWAN KUMAR S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MADHUSUDHAN M.N., ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 IS MINOR REPRESENTED BY R1) THIS RP IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER IN RPFC NO.106/2022 DATED 02.08.2022 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. This Review Petition is filed seeking review of the order dated 02.08.2022 in RPFC No.106/2022, wherein this Court dismissed the petition by confirming the Order dated 28.02.2022 in C.Misc.No.155/2019 on the file of Prl. Judge, Family Court at Tumakuru. 3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the records. 4. The Family Court, Tumakuru, has awarded maintenance to the wife and their child aged 4 years and accordingly, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37048 RP No. 220 of 2023 directed the respondent - husband to pay maintenance of Rs.15,000/- to petitioner No.1 (wife) and Rs.10,000 to petitioner No.2 (child). 5. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties and also the salary slip of the petitioner herein, filed along with the memo dated 08.09.2025, wherein it is stated that gross salary of the petitioner during the month of July, 2025 is Rs.92,438/- and net salary after standard deductions is Rs.90,438/-, and in that view of the matter, taking into consideration the fact that the respondents herein are respondents before the Trial Court, I am of the view that, the award of maintenance is just and proper and accordingly, no interference is called for in this petition. It is also made clear that there is no error apparent on the face of the record. 6. Accordingly, the Review Petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23