Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69864 (ALL)

VISHAL SHARMA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIC/20464/2025 · 2025-09-24

Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar J Criminal, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 20464 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State respondent and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-Bank. 2. Counsel on behalf of the petitioner has stated that the petitioner had taken loan but the same could not be repaid as per the terms of the agreement. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the petitioner is ready and willing to deposit the amount due against her in case she is permitted to do so in easy installments. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Bank, on instructions, submits that the total amount due against the petitioner as on September 20, 2025 is Rs.12,26,233/-. He, however, states that the Bank is ready to accept the amount due. 4. Upon hearing the counsel appearing on behalf of the parties and after considering the material on record, we are of the view that the appropriate direction should be issued. 5. Accordingly, we direct that the initial payment of 25% of the aforementioned due amount shall be made by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from date. On initial payment being made, the respondent Bank shall provide the statement of account to the petitioner forthwith. Thereafter, the balance amount shall be paid by the petitioner in three equal monthly installments starting from December, 2025. 6. Till the period prescribed for depositing the aforesaid amount, the recovery proceedings against the petitioner will be kept in abeyance. However, we make it clear that in case the petitioner defaults in depositing the initial amount or thereafter the installments within the stipulated period, it will be open for the respondent Bank to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinayak Varma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Vishal Sharma And Another .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) 7. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. September 25, 2025 DKS WRIC No. 20464 of 2025 2 (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR SRIVASTWA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad