216 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS MUKESH CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Present Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana, for the applicants None for the respondent. * SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA CM-4488-LPA For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and delay of 30 days in filing the appeal is hereby condoned. CM-4487-LPA For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and delay LPA-1973-2019 (O&M) 1. The present appeal has been preferred by the State of Haryana assailing order dated 29.05.2019 passed by the learned Single Bench in CWP-15464-2017 whereby the Court ha the benefit of experience gained by the Writ Petitioner (respondent herein) while working with the State Government on contract basis 2011 onwards for the purpose of granting him marks against the experienc 2. Heard learned State counsel at length. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS V HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana, for the applicants-appellants None for the respondent. **** SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) LPA-2019 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and delay of 30 days in filing the appeal is hereby condoned. LPA-2019 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and delay of 74 days in refiling the appeal is hereby condoned. 2019 (O&M) The present appeal has been preferred by the State of Haryana assailing order dated 29.05.2019 passed by the learned Single Bench in 2017 whereby the Court has allowed the Writ Petition granting the benefit of experience gained by the Writ Petitioner (respondent herein) while working with the State Government on contract basis 2011 onwards for the purpose of granting him marks against the experienc Heard learned State counsel at length. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA-1973-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19th of March, 2025 ..…...Petitioner(s) V/s. .......Respondent(s) SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana, For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and delay of 30 days in filing the appeal is hereby condoned. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is of 74 days in refiling the appeal is hereby condoned. The present appeal has been preferred by the State of Haryana assailing order dated 29.05.2019 passed by the learned Single Bench in allowed the Writ Petition granting the benefit of experience gained by the Writ Petitioner (respondent herein) while working with the State Government on contract basis from the year 2011 onwards for the purpose of granting him marks against the experience. Heard learned State counsel at length. Suresh Kumar 2025.03.21 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document LPA-1973-2019 3. It is to be noticed that respondent got 50.66 placed at No. 1 in the merit learned Single Bench to the respondent respondent at par with other candidates with all consequential benefits, does not warrant any interference Court. The Appeal dismiss the Appeal 4. Al accordingly. March 19, 2025 Ess Kay Whether speaking / reasoned Whether Reportable 2019 (O&M) It is to be noticed that respondent got 50.66 No. 1 in the merit list. In view thereto, the direction learned Single Bench to the respondent-State to regularize the service o at par with other candidates, as reflected in documents therein with all consequential benefits, does not warrant any interference Appeal is though time barred, but we condone the delay and Appeal on merits accordingly. All pending applications in this [SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA [MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA , 2025 Whether speaking / reasoned : Whether Reportable : It is to be noticed that respondent got 50.66 marks and was . In view thereto, the directions issued by the State to regularize the service of the as reflected in documents therein, with all consequential benefits, does not warrant any interference by this is though time barred, but we condone the delay and pending applications in this case are disposed of SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA] JUDGE [MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA] JUDGE : Yes / No : Yes / No Suresh Kumar 2025.03.21 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document