IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66784 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2025 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1. Aman Kumar S/O Nawal Kishor Ray R/O Village- Chandpura, P.S.- Raghopur, District- Vaishali 2. Rohit Kumar S/O Nawal Kishor Ray R/O Village- Chandpura, P.S.- Raghopur, District- Vaishali 3. Nawal Kishor Ray S/O Late Vashudev Ray @ Bashudev Ray R/O Village- Chandpura, P.S.- Raghopur, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashutosh Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr.Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 17-09-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the defect pointed out by the Office stands removed and a supplementary affidavit has been filed detailing the criminal antecedent of the petitioners. 3. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No.24/2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(1), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66784 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 2/3 petitioner no.1 and 2 are persons of clean antecedent and petitioner no.3 has antecedent of one case. It is next submitted that petitioner no.1 and 2 are sons of petitioner no.3 and on account of dispute relating to land the occurrence has alleged to have taken place and Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 25.01.2025 at 12:00 P.M., the accused persons came to his house and Nawal Kishor assaulted him by ‘lathi’ causing injury on his chest. Thereafter, Prince assaulted by ‘kulhari’ causing injury on head and thereafter Rohit assaulted by ‘bhala’ causing injury on leg and Aman assaulted him causing injury on his ear and nose and Sarita Devi squeezed his private part when he had got his hydrocele operated about 20 days back. Further, Guddu also assaulted by butt of pistol on his chest and the accused after threatening and snatching Rs.10,000/- fled and the informant was taken to the hospital for treatment. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners and submits that there is specific allegation of assaulting the informant by the petitioners. It is also submitted that the injury suffered by the informant have been opined to be grievous and the assault is also on vital Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66784 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 3/3 part of the body. It is also submitted that in the event, if, privilege of anticipatory bail is granted, the petitioners may abscond. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned APP for the State, the Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands rejected. pallavi/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T