APHC010068422004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL NO: 827/2004 Between: 1. A.V. NARASIMHA RAO, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO RETIRED V.A.O. MADIKI, ALAMURU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. TANTRAVAHI PARVATA VARDHANI, W/O. T.S. PRAKASARAO R/O. SEETHAMMA DHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM (PO) & DISTRICT. 2. ATREYAPURAPU VENKATA BHASKARA RAMARAO, S/O. VENKATESWARARAO R/O. MADIKI, ALAMURU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. ATREYAPURAPU HEMALATHA, W/O. VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA R/O. YERNAGUDEM, KOVVURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. SATHIRAJU JALAJA, W/O. S. RAMAKRISHNA PARAMAHAMSA R/O. YERNAGUDEM, KOVVURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. MANTRIPRAGADA USHA, W/O. SAMBASIVARAO C/O. S. RAMAKRISHNA PARAMAHAMSA, R/O. YERNAGUDEM, KOVVURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. ATRAYAPURAPU INDIRA, D/O. VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA R/O. YERNAGUDEM, KOVVURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. TELIDEVARA VENKATA SUBBALAKSHMI, W/O.LATE VENKATESWARARAO R/O. KATARI NAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 8. VELICHETI VENKATA RATNAVATHI, W/O. SEETHAPATHIRAO R/O. SEETHAMPETA, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 9. TANTRAVAHI PUSHKARA LAKSHMI, W/O. VENKATARAO R/O. PASALAPUDI, RAMACHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 10. KEERTI SWARAJYA LAKSHMI, W/O. K.B. SHANKARARAO R/O. KATARI NAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 11. ADDANKI BHASKARA LAKSHMI, W/O. SUBBARAO R/O. KATARI NAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 12. K RADHA, W/O. PRASAD C/O. J.S. PRAKASA RAO, SEETHAMMA DHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM (PO) & DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Appellant: 1. S SURENDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K L N RAO The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL No.827 OF 2004 J U D G M E N T: No representation on either side, though the matter is posted under the caption “for dismissal”. There was no representation for the appellant today, as well as on the previous adjournment. 2. In that view of the matter, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI 01.04.2025 Pmk 11 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL No.827 OF 2004 Date:01.04.2025 Pmk