123 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6423-2025 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 17.06.2025 SAKIRA AND ANOTHER .......PETITIONER(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. A.S. Rainal, Advocate and Mr. K.S. Voha, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Chetan Sharma, DAG, Haryana. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(Oral) This Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226/227 for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus for issuance of direction to official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and to restrain the private respondents not to harass the petitioners. Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, learned State Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State, who assures the Court that necessary action will be taken on the representation dated 11.06.2025 (Annexure P-3) after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, by passing a speaking order within a period of three days from today, in the light of Anuradha 2025.06.17 06:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-6423-2025 (O&M) 2 notification No.12/252/2023-4HG-IV dated 17.02.2025 issued by the Home Department, Government of Haryana. In light of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the instant petition any further. The present petition stands dismissed as not pressed. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to file appeal, as is stipulated in the Standard Operating Procedure as per law, in case of any grievance left after passing of the speaking order. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 17.06.2025 JUDGE anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Anuradha 2025.06.17 06:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document