Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69839 (KAR)

SRI SHIVA KUMAR K S v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/21776/2022 · 2025-11-12

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46821 WP No. 21776 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 21776 OF 2022 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: 1. SRI SHIVA KUMAR K S S/O LATE SIDDANANJAIAH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, 2. SMT. MANGALA GOWRAMMA W/O LATE SRIKANTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 3. SRI. SOMASHKARARADHYA W/O LATE SRIKANTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, PETITIONERS NO.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT KODLAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST, KORATAGERE TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT 572 121 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SUBRAHMANYA P D DATTATRAY HEGDE.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA HOME DEPARTMENT LAW AND ORDER VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE TUMKUR DISTRICT, TUMKUR 572 102 Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46821 WP No. 21776 of 2022 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER KORATAGERE POLICE STATION, KORATAGERE CIRCLE, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT- 572 121 4. MR. RENUKARADDYA S/O LATE SIDDANANJAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 5. MR. SIDDANANJARADHYA S/O RENUKARADHYA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, 6. MR. YATHEESH ARADHYA S/O RENUKARADHYA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, RESPONDENT NOS. 4 TO 6 ARE RESIDENTS OF KODLAHALLI VILLAGE, HOLAVANAHALLI HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT- 572 121 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTER., ADVOCATE) THIS WP FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-DIRECT THE R2 AND 3 HEREIN TO PROVIDE PROTECTION TO THE PETITIONERS TO ENTER THE VILLAGE AND RESIDE PEACEFULLY IN THEIR HOUSE AT VILLAGE, HOLAVANAHALLI HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT, ANNEXURE-M AND N DTD 20.06.2021 AND DTD 22.06.2022 RESPECTIVELY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46821 WP No. 21776 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for writ of mandamus against the respondent Nos.2 and 3 to provide protection to the petitioner to enter the village and to reside peacefully in the house. 2. It is to be concluded that such a writ is not maintainable, as the petitioner has not alleged complaint against anyone. 3. Having taken note of the prayer made in the writ petition, I am of the view that such a prayer cannot be acceded to under Article-226 of the Constitution of India, however, in the event if there is any life threat to the petitioner, it is open for the petitioner to approach the Jurisdictional Police Station for redressal of the grievance. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46821 WP No. 21776 of 2022 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE JJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23