Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69838 (PAT)

Rajesh Kumar Ray v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./58056/2025 · 2025-09-04

Sunil Dutta Mishra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58056 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-103 Year-2025 Thana- KISHANPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== Rajesh Kumar Ray, S/o Late Radha Kant Ray, R/o Village- Khanpur Sonbarsha, Ward No. 4, P.S.- Kishanpur, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shatrughna Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 04-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 103 of 2025 for the offence registered under Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Amendment Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, total recovery of 717 litres of illicit liquor was made from the barn (bhusa ghar) of the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case on the basis of suspicion. He has no concern with the seized liquor. Nothing incriminating was recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Recovery is made from Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58056 of 2025(2) dt.04-09-2025 2/2 the barn where cattle food was stored was not under the conscious possession of the petitioner. Charge-sheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of absconding of the petitioner or tampering with the evidence. Petitioner is in jail custody since 05.06.2025, having no criminal antecedent. Petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the trial of the case. 5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and period of custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Exclusive Excise Court No. 1, Supaul in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 103 of 2025. khushbu/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T