Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69835 (PAT)

Chandra Shekhar kushwaha @ Chandra Shekhar singh v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./62175/2024 · 2025-07-23

Smt Soni Shrivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62175 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-426 Year-2024 Thana- MOHANIYA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Chandra Shekhar kushwaha @ Chandra Shekhar singh son of Late shivbachan kushwaha @ Late shiv bachan singh village- Bamhaur, Ps- Mohania, Dist- Kaimur at Bhabua ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Tribhuwan Narayan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 5 23-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 26 of the B.N.S. 3. The prosecution story discloses the fact that while the informant had gone to the field along with her child to attend call of nature, the petitioner caught hold of her left hand with the intention to outrage her modesty and when she protested, the petitioner dragged her down and thereafter fled away. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations levelled in the First Information Report are not correct and as a matter of fact, the dispute had arisen between the petitioner and the informant with regard to grazing of the field of the petitioner which was being objected to by the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62175 of 2024(5) dt.23-07-2025 2/2 petitioner. No incident of any outraging the modesty of the informant has happened and absolutely false and baseless allegations have been levelled against the petitioner. It has also been submitted that no substantive material collected during the course of investigation. 5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the application for anticipatory bail. 6. Considering all the above mentioned facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Mohania P.S. Case No. 426 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S. with further condition that one of the bailors will be a family member/close relative. devendra/- (Soni Shrivastava, J) U T