Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6983 (MAD)

The General Manager v. Vigneswaran

CMP(MD)/20120/2025 · 2026-06-18

K K Ramakrishnan, N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.M.P.(MD).No.20120 of 2025 in C.M.A(MD) SR.No.104556 of 2025 N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. and K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J. This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 259 days in filing the above appeal. 2. The notice sent to the first respondent was returned with the endorsement ‘Insufficient address’. 3. In view of the memo filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, notice to the second respondent is dispensed with. 4. Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is allowed and delay is condoned. 5. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. [N.A.V., J.] [K.K.R.K., J,] 18.06.2026 Indu https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis