Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69824 (PNJ)

GAUTAM SONKAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M/32530/2025 · 2025-08-21

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-32530-2025 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.212 CRM-M-32530-2025(O&M) Date of decision: 21.08.2025 Gautam Sonkar and another ..... Petitioners VERSUS State of UT Chandigarh ..... Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Rubal Pawar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Virat Rana, Addl. PP, UT Chandigarh. ***** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J. (ORAL) 1 The instant petition under Section 482 of BNSS has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in FIR No.15, dated 1.2.2025 under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(3), 190, 191(2) of BNS (Section 109 of BNS added later on during the course of investigation) registered at Police Station Sector-26, UT, Chandigarh. 2. This Court vide order dated 24.06.2025, while issuing notice of motion, granted the concession of interim bail to petitioner No.1, subject to his joining the investigation. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in pursuance to the order dated 24.6.2025, petitioner No.1 has joined the investigation. 4. Learned State counsel on instructions from the concerned investigating officer does not controvert the said fact and further submits that custodial interrogation of the petitioner No.1 is not required. RAMANDEEP SINGH 2025.08.22 10:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-32530-2025 (O&M) 2 5. In view of the above, the order dated 24.6.2025 is made absolute. 6. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE 21.08.2025 Ramandeep Singh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes/ No RAMANDEEP SINGH 2025.08.22 10:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document