Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
209
CRM-M-32523-2025 (O&M)
Date of Decision : 28.07.2025
MANMEET SINGH
…. PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA
…. RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present :- Mr.Naveen Kashyap, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Atul Gaur, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Ravikant Beriwal, Advocate for
Mr. Baljeet Beniwal, Advocate
for the complainant.
**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (Oral)
FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections 126 29.04.2025 Cyber Crime Central, District Faridabad 318(4) and 61(2) of BNS, 2023
The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., seeking anticipatory bail
2.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present petition, the petitioner has been arrested rendering the present petition infructuous.
3.
Given above, petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(ANOOP CHITKARA)
JUDGE 28.07.2025 anju Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable : Yes/No
Anju Goel 2025.07.30 11:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh