BNSS is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case 20.01.2025, registered at Police Station Lopoke, District Amritsar Rural, under Sections (corresponding Sections 323 2. custody for of 43 days in lodging the FIR. declared simple, for which reference is made to MLR reproduced in the FIR, while grievous to co vide order Annexure P dated 15.10.2025 Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case 20.01.2025, registered at Police Station Lopoke, District Amritsar Rural, under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 117(2) a (corresponding Sections 323, 324, 325, 326 and 34 IPC). Learned counsel contends that the petitioner has been in custody for about 4 months. He alleges false implication. of 43 days in lodging the FIR. The injury declared simple, for which reference is made to MLR reproduced in the , while grievous to co-accused Sukhdev Singh, who is on default bail, rder Annexure P-3, as also co-accused Angrej Singh, vide order dated 15.10.2025 passed by this Court, Annexure P Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.05 dated 20.01.2025, registered at Police Station Lopoke, District Amritsar Rural, 118(2), 117(2) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023 326 and 34 IPC). Learned counsel contends that the petitioner has been in He alleges false implication. There is delay The injury attributed to him has been declared simple, for which reference is made to MLR reproduced in the accused Sukhdev Singh, who is on default bail, accused Angrej Singh, vide order Annexure P-2. Challan has been PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.05.20 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. presented on 30.03.2026, however, charges are yet to be framed and there are, in all, 14 PWs. He is not involved in any other case. 3. The custody certificate dated 19.05.2026, filed by the learned State counsel is taken on record. As per the same, the petitioner is behind bars for 3 months and 27 days. 4. Learned State counsel opposes the bail on the ground that there are specific allegations against the petitioner of having given ‘barcha’ blow on the back of head of Gursewak Singh. However, she is unable to controvert the submissions with regard to stage of the case; the petitioner being not involved in any other case and the co-accused are on bail. 5. Heard. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, in particular he being in custody for the last 3 months and 27 days; not involved in any other case; co-accused are on bail; hallan stands presented on 30.03.2026, but charges have not been framed and there are total 14 PWs; the trial is likely to take a considerable time and further incarceration of the petitioner would be violative of his right enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, thus the present petition is allowed. 7. The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing requisite bail bond/surety bond to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned. 8. It is made abundantly clear that in case there is any breach of the conditions imposed by the Court concerned, the State shall be at PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.05.20 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. liberty to seek cancellation of bail as granted to the petitioner by this order. 9. In view of the above, it is clarified that the observations made herein above are limited for the purpose of present proceedings and would not be construed as any opinion on the merits of the case and the trial would proceed independently of the aforesaid observations. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.05.20 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.