Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69812 (PNJ)

USHA DEVI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/6331/2025 · 2025-06-13

To Be Nominated

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[117] Usha Devi and another The State of Punjab and others Coram : Present: ROHIT KAPOOR [1] there is a threat to the life and liberty of the petitioner [2] 10.06.2025 Superintendent of Police, however, [3] [4] the official respondents, i.e. respondent Nos.1 to and waives service. [5] expressing any opinion petitioner respondent No. (Annexure P notified vide [6] 13.06.2025 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6331 Date of Decision : 1 Usha Devi and another versus The State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Navraj Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. **** ROHIT KAPOOR, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner there is a threat to the life and liberty of the petitioner The petitioners have .06.2025 (Annexure P-5) to respondent No. Superintendent of Police, District Rupnagar, Punjab, through e , no action has been taken thereupon. Notice of motion. Mr. Ishan Kaushal, learned AAG, Punjab, the official respondents, i.e. respondent Nos.1 to and waives service. Keeping in view the limited pr expressing any opinion on the merits of the averments made by the petitioners, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation (Annexure P-5) in pursuance with the Standard Operating Procedures notified vide Notification dated 23.01.2025. Disposed of in the aforesaid terms. .06.2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 6331-2025 Date of Decision : 13.06.2025 …Petitioners versus ….Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Advocate for the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitionersinter alia contends that there is a threat to the life and liberty of the petitioners. moved representation dated ) to respondent No.2, i.e. the Senior District Rupnagar, Punjab, through e-mail, no action has been taken thereupon. Mr. Ishan Kaushal, learned AAG, Punjab, appears on behalf of the official respondents, i.e. respondent Nos.1 to 3, on advance notice Keeping in view the limited prayer made and without the merits of the averments made by the , the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to to decide the representation dated 10.06.2025 in pursuance with the Standard Operating Procedures Notification dated 23.01.2025. the aforesaid terms. (ROHIT KAPOOR) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No contends that moved representation dated the Senior mail, appears on behalf of , on advance notice ayer made and without the merits of the averments made by the , the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to 10.06.2025 in pursuance with the Standard Operating Procedures RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.06.13 15:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document