2025: JHHC: 15428 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 247 of 2025 1. Jangi Chamar @ Jangi Ram, S/o Late Tekal Chamar@ Pokal Chamar, aged about 69 years, resident of Village-Morwe, P.O.- Morwe, P.S. Manjhiaon, District- Garhwa, Jharkhand. 2. Umesh Ram S/o Late Somaru Ram, aged about 40 years, resident of Village Morwe, P.O.- Morwe, P.S.-Manjhiaon, District- Garhwa, Jharkhand. 3. Bigan Ram S/o Late Ramdeo Ram, aged about 64 years, resident of Village Morwe, P.O. Morwe, P.S.-Manjhiaon, District- Garhwa, Jharkhand. 4. Ashok Ram S/o Late Ramdeo Ram, aged about 39 years, resident of Village- Morwe, P.O. Morwe, P.S.-Manjhiaon, District- Garhwa, Jharkhand. 5. Sagar Ram S/o Late Jitan Ram and Grand Son of Dukhi Chamar, aged about 38 years, resident of Village- Morwe, P.O.- Morwe, P.S.- Manjhiaon, District- Garhwa, Jharkhand. 6. Bijendra Ram S/o Late Jitan Ram and Grand Son of Dukhi Chamar, aged about 35 years, resident of Village - Morwe, P.O.- Morwe, P.S.- Manjhiaon, District-Garhwa, Jharkhand. 7. Pravesh ram S/o Late Chhathan Ram and Grand Son of Late Thakuri Chamar, aged about 56 years, resident of Village - Morwe, P.O.- Morwe, P.S.- Manjhiaon, District-Garhwa, Jharkhand. 8. Sudesh Ram, S/o Late Chhathan Ram and Grand son of Late Thakuri Chamar, aged about 43 years, resident of Village - Morwe, P.O.- Morwe, P.S.- Manjhiaon, District-Garhwa, Jharkhand. … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Deputy Commissioner, Garhwa, P.O.+P.S. & Dist. Gahrwa 2. Executive Engineer, Rupankan Divisioin No. 2, Medininagar, P.O. + P.S. Medininagar, District Palamau, Jharkhand … … Opp. Parties --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Ravi Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advocate 2025: JHHC: 15428 2 --- 03/13th June 2025 1. Learned counsel for the parties are present. 2. This petition has been filed for restoration of F.A. No. 264 of 2023 which stood dismissed on 06.02.2025 on account of non-removal of defects in terms of order dated 09.01.2025. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners could not remove the defects as they could not arrange the requisite court fee in short period. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the First Appeal be restored to its original file and he undertakes to remove the defects. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party has no serious objection to the prayer made for restoration. 5. Considering the aforesaid submission, time granted to the petitioners to remove the defects in F.A. No. 264 of 2023 vide order dated 09.01.2025 is extended till 25.06.2025. 6. If the defects in the first appeal are removed within extended time, office is directed to place F.A. No. 264 of 2023 before appropriate Bench as per roster. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Mukul