LUBNA MURSALEEN AND ANR. v. SAQIB MURTAZA (REVENUE DEPARTMENT)
CCP(S)/142/2023 · 2025-05-27
Javed Iqbal Wani
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6978 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6978 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No.86 Regular IN THE HIGH C0URT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) 142/2023 in[WP(C) 1149/2022] LUBNA MURSALEEN AND ANR …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Syed Mansoor, Advocate Vs. SAQIB MURTAZA (REVENUE DEPARTMENT) ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. H. Aman Ali, Dy. AG.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER 27.05.2025
Adjourned on account of non-availability of arguing counsel for the petitioners. At this stage, the proxy counsel appearing for the petitioners’ states that he is under instructions to make the statement that grievance of the petitioners stands redressed. Under these circumstances, contempt notice issued is recalled and proceedings are closed.
(JAVED IQBAL WANI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 27.05.2025 Hilal