Court No. - 76 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 19488 of 2024 Applicant :- Gaugyan Foundation Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Vikash Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J. 1. Shri Vikas Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, appears and seeks an adjournment, stating that the arguing counsel is facing personal difficulty. 2. On perusal of the order sheet, it's observed that; (a) on the first date, learned counsel for the applicant sought an adjournment, (b) on the second date, proceedings were disrupted due to a strike by the Bar Association, and (c) on the third date, learned counsel for the applicant once again requested for adjournment of the case. 3. Today, again learned counsel for the applicant requested for an adjournment. 4. In the given circumstances, it's observed that repeated requests for adjournment is either the applicant has no substantive grounds for quashing of the proceedings or he is deliberately avoiding to address the court. 5. In view of the continued lack of prosecution, the instant application stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Order Date :- 6.3.2025 Anil K. Sharma Justice Vinod Diwakar Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad