Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69775 (KAR)

S R BHEEMARAYASHETTY v. G GANESHAMURTHY

WP/33044/2025 · 2025-11-03

B M Shyam Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44112 WP No. 33044 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 33044 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. S R BHEEMARAYASHETTY S/O SHANKARIRAMA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS, 2. S B THIMMARAJU S/O S R BHEEMARAYASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, BOTH ARE AGRICULTURISTS AND MERCHANTS, PROP: S R B BOOKS STALL, R/O MAIN ROAD, HOSADURGA TOWN-577527 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. JAGADEESH D C.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. G GANESHAMURTHY S/O GOVINDAPPA DAGADI, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O CHOWDESHWARI STREET, Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44112 WP No. 33044 of 2025 KOTE EXTENSION, HOSADURGA TOWN-577527 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. 2. SMT. SARASWATHI W/O SIDDALINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O DODDAENNEGERE AT POST, HANDANAKETE HOBLI, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572119 3. CHANDRAPPA K S/O LATE KALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST AND BUSINESS MAN, R/O NEAR RAMAMANDIRA, ASHOKA NAGARA, BIRUR-577116 CHIKKAMAGALORE DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS TO THE CASE ON HAND IN OS NO. 469/2025 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT HOSADURGA AND PERUSE THE SAME; QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 17.10.2025 PASSED ON IA NO. IV IN OS NO. 469/2025 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT HOSADURGA VIDE ANNX-F AS THE SAME IS ILLEGAL AND - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44112 WP No. 33044 of 2025 UNSUSTAINABLE IN LAW AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE IV FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 2(A) CPC VIDE ANX-E IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD ORAL ORDER The petitioners are the first and the second defendants in O.S.No.469/2025 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Hosadurga [for short, 'the civil Court']. The petitioners' grievance is with the civil Court receiving the first respondent - the plaintiff's application [I.A.No.4] under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for action against them. The civil Court by the impugned order dated 17.10.2025 has, upon receipt of the application, directed its Registry to register such application as a separate petition. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44112 WP No. 33044 of 2025 Mr. D. C. Jagadeesh, the learned counsel for the petitioners, proposes to argue on the very maintainability of the application, asserting that if the suit is not maintainable, the application for initiation of contempt proceedings would not be maintainable. When queried, the learned counsel submits that his instructions are that the civil Court's Registry has registered the application in Miscellaneous Petition No.12/2025 and notice is issued, but the petitioners are not served. This Court does not find any irregularity in the civil Court directing the application to be registered as a separate petition, and it is still open to the petitioners to show cause against the maintainability of the petition. This Court observes that it would be open to the petitioners, if they propose to contest the maintainability of the petition, to file their objections and as such, there is no reason for interfering with the impugned order dated 17.10.2025. Therefore, the - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44112 WP No. 33044 of 2025 petition stands disposed of without prejudice to the petitioners' right to contest either the suit or the miscellaneous petition. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE RB