MOUSUMI PARVEEN AND ANR. v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
WPA/15519/2025 · 2025-11-27
Shampa Dutt Paul
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69773 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69773 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
27.11.2025
Ct. No. 30
SL No.13 MKP
WPA 15519 of 2025
Mousumi Parveen And Anr
Vs.
The State Of West Bengal And Ors
Mr. Prosenjit Mukherjee Ms. Babita Pramanik Mr. Raja Roy ……..for the Petitioner
In spite of being appointed on 11.11.2025 to represent the State, the Learned Counsel for the State is not present and as such no report has been placed. Considering the grievances of the petitioner that his rejection order does not contain any reasons provided by the authority concerned, the writ application is disposed of with leave granted to the petitioner to make a representation containing his grievances, as made in the writ application before the District Controller being the respondent no.4, herein, within 10 days from the date of this
order and on receiving the said representation, the respondent no.4 shall consider the same, in
2 accordance with law and dispose of the same within 60 days thereafter, on hearing the parties and by passing a reasoned order. The writ application is disposed of. Applications, if any, connected thereto stand
disposed of consequently. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis upon compliance of all formalities.
[Shampa Dutt (Paul). J]