Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69768 (PNJ)

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS v. ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL AND ANR

CWP/17353/2025 · 2025-07-01

Meenakshi I Mehta, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

164 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Union of India and others Armed Forces Tribunal CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Present: Dr. Anandeshwar Gautam, SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) 1. The challenge is to the order passed by the learned Armed Forces Tribunal dated 2. Learned counsel submits that there was no occasion to round off the disability from 40% to 50%. 3. The issue is no more by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of and others, 2025 SSC OnLine passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of others vs. Ram Avtar 2014 SCC 4. In view thereto, 5. All pending misc. application(s) also stand disposed of. 01.07.2025 rajesh 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? 2. Whether reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17353 Date of Decision: Union of India and others Vs. Armed Forces Tribunal and another HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Dr. Anandeshwar Gautam, Sr. Panel Counsel for the petitioners. *** SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) The challenge is to the order passed by the learned Armed Forces Tribunal dated 30.03.2023. Learned counsel submits that there was no occasion to round off the disability from 40% to 50%. The issue is no more res-integra by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Bijender Singh v. Union of India and others, 2025 SSC OnLine SC 895, which affirms the earlier judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of others vs. Ram Avtar 2014 SCC Online SC 1761 In view thereto, the writ petition is dismissed. All pending misc. application(s) also stand disposed of. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? 2. Whether reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 17353-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.07.2025 …Petitioners …Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Sr. Panel Counsel for the petitioners. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) The challenge is to the order passed by the learned Armed Learned counsel submits that there was no occasion to round off integra in view of the judgment passed Bijender Singh v. Union of India , which affirms the earlier judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Union of India and Online SC 1761. the writ petition is dismissed. All pending misc. application(s) also stand disposed of. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No Sr. Panel Counsel for the petitioners. The challenge is to the order passed by the learned Armed Learned counsel submits that there was no occasion to round off ent passed Bijender Singh v. Union of India , which affirms the earlier judgment Union of India and RAJESH KUMAR 2025.07.02 14:03 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.