UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS v. ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL AND ANR
CWP/17353/2025 · 2025-07-01
Meenakshi I Mehta, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69768 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69768 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
164
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Union of India and others Armed Forces Tribunal
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
Present: Dr. Anandeshwar Gautam,
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral)
1.
The challenge is to the order passed by the learned Armed Forces Tribunal dated
2.
Learned counsel submits that there was no occasion to round off the disability from 40% to 50%.
3.
The issue is no more by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of and others, 2025 SSC OnLine passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of others vs. Ram Avtar 2014 SCC
4.
In view thereto,
5.
All pending misc. application(s) also stand disposed of.
01.07.2025 rajesh
1. Whether speaking/reasoned?
2. Whether reportable?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17353 Date of Decision:
Union of India and others
Vs. Armed Forces Tribunal and another
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Dr. Anandeshwar Gautam, Sr. Panel Counsel for the petitioners.
***
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) The challenge is to the order passed by the learned Armed Forces Tribunal dated 30.03.2023.
Learned counsel submits that there was no occasion to round off the disability from 40% to 50%. The issue is no more res-integra by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Bijender Singh v. Union of India and others, 2025 SSC OnLine SC 895, which affirms the earlier judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of others vs. Ram Avtar 2014 SCC Online SC 1761 In view thereto, the writ petition is dismissed. All pending misc. application(s) also stand disposed of.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA)
1. Whether speaking/reasoned?
2. Whether reportable?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 17353-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.07.2025
…Petitioners
…Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Sr. Panel Counsel for the petitioners.
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) The challenge is to the order passed by the learned Armed
Learned counsel submits that there was no occasion to round off integra in view of the judgment passed Bijender Singh v. Union of India , which affirms the earlier judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Union of India and Online SC 1761. the writ petition is dismissed. All pending misc. application(s) also stand disposed of.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA)
JUDGE
: Yes/No
: Yes/No
Sr. Panel Counsel for the petitioners. The challenge is to the order passed by the learned Armed
Learned counsel submits that there was no occasion to round off ent passed Bijender Singh v. Union of India , which affirms the earlier judgment Union of India and
RAJESH KUMAR 2025.07.02 14:03 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.